Terrill

Terrill v. Superior Court

Good Law
1899 Cal. LEXIS 1187·6 Cal. Unrep. 398·60 P. 38
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 1899S. F. No. 2120California1,793 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Temple, J.

This is an application for a writ of prohibition directed to the above-named court. The petition shows the following facts, which are admitted in the answer: The petitioner was regularly indicted by the grand jury of the county of Santa Clara upon a charge of forgery. Upon this indictment the petitioner was duly arraigned, and thereupon interposed a demurrer to the indictment. The demurrer having been submitted after argument, the court sustained the same in the following order: “Defendant now presents and files a demurrer to said indictment, which is argued and submitted to the court, and the court, after due consideration, orders that said demurrer be sustained and the indictment resubmitted to the present grand jury, to which the defendant excepts.” Thereafter the district attorney presented the charge to the same grand jury which had found the indiet *400 ment to which the demurrer was sustained, which was then in session, and the said grand jury, on the same day, to wit, May 31, 1899, found and returned into court another indictment, charging the petitioner with the same offense, founded upon the same facts with which he had been charged in the first indictment. Afterward the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.