White

White v. White

Good Law
1900 Cal. LEXIS 1119·6 Cal. Unrep. 499·62 P. 34
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 31, 1900S. F. No. 1380California2,013 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Haynes, J.

This appeal is from an order made upon the petition of the respondent, Frankie White, granting her a writ of assistance to obtain possession of certain real estate then in the possession of appellant, Rohrbough, who claims under a lease from the plaintiff, George E. White. The following statement of facts is condensed from said petition: In December, 1885, George E. White commenced a suit against his wife, Frankie White, to obtain a divorce. She answered, and also filed a cross-complaint, with the usual prayer for counsel fees, expenses and permanent support. On May 15, 1889, an interlocutory decree was entered upon said cross-complaint granting her prayer for divorce, and enjoining the plaintiff, George E. White, from in any manner disposing of or affecting the community property or his separate property, except that the plaintiff should “be permitted to pursue and carry on his ordinary business”; this injunction to continue until the further supplemental and final decree should be entered and carried into effect. This interlocutory decree was recorded in May, 1889, in the counties of Mendocino, Trinity and Humboldt, and copies thereof served upon the plaintiff and upon…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.