Marks

Marks v. Evans

Good Law
1900 Cal. LEXIS 1124·6 Cal. Unrep. 505·62 P. 76
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 2, 1900S. F. No. 2173California2,954 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Gray, J.

In this case the court below sustained a demurrer to the complaint, without leave to amend, and dismissed the case. Plaintiff appealed from the judgment of dismissal.

The complaint alleges, in substance, that in or about the month of January, 1883, the plaintiff was, and ever since has been, uneducated, and of a credulous, confiding disposition; that one John Dunn and the defendants Evans and Rodda were acute business men, friends among themselves, and the intimate friends of the plaintiff; that in or about said month last aforesaid the defendants last named and said John Dunn entered into a conspiracy among themselves to cheat and defraud plaintiff, and that in pursuance of said conspiracy they induced him by false and fraudulent representations to subscribe for stock, and put between four and five thousand dollars into a corporation named the San Francisco Fuse Manufacturing Company, which they had formed for the express purpose of receiving the plaintiff’s said money, and-with the view of subsequently cheating him out of it and acquiring it to their own use; that in 1884, in pursuance of their said conspiracy, the said John Dunn and said defendants Evans and Rodda, being in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.