Painter

Painter's Executors v. Painter

Good Law
6 Cal. Unrep. 677·66 P. 135
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 25, 1901S. F. No. 1971California2,496 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Appeal from a judgment for plaintiffs and from an order denying the defendants a new trial. The ease was before this court on appeal from a former judgment and similar order in favor of plaintiffs, and reversed, reported in 4 Cal. Unrep. 636 , 36 Pac. 865 . The case, stated generally, and so far as identical on the two appeals, or noting divergences, is as follows: The defendants and the plaintiffs’ testator, Jerome Painter, were brothers, and at the time of the death of the latter he and Theodore were partners, under the firm name of Painter ’& Co., in the business of printing and of manufacturing type in the city of San Francisco. Jerome died February 6, 1883, and by his will the plaintiffs and the defendant Theodore were named as executors, and qualified as such; but the latter resigned May 3, 1888. On the death of Jerome the business and assets of the firm came to the hands of Theodore as surviving partner. But shortly afterward he formed a partnership with the defendant Milton under the firm name of Painter & Co., and thereafter the business of the old firm and that of the new was carried on under the same management, under the name of Painter & Co., up to May 17, 1889, when…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.