Borchard

Borchard v. Eastwood

Good Law
1901 Cal. LEXIS 1255·6 Cal. Unrep. 736·65 P. 1047
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 24, 1901L. A. No. 869California1,608 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Cooper, J.

Action to quiet title. Plaintiff recovered judgment and defendant appeals therefrom and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The premises are described in the complaint as “lying and being in the Rancho Santiago de Santa Ana, county of Orange, state of California, bounded and particularly described as follows, to wit: Beginning at a point 15.825 *737 chains east from the corner of sections 28, 29, 32, and 33, township 4 S., R. 9 W., S. B. M.; thence north 16.93 chains; thence east 5.905 chains; thence south 16.93 chains; thence west 5,905 chains, to point of beginning—containing ten acres. The same being a portion of lots 13 and 14, block F, of the A. B. Chapman tract, as per map made by Frank Leeouvereur in December, 1870.” At the close of plaintiff's evidence the defendant made a motion for a nonsuit, which was denied, and it is claimed that the court erred in denying the motion. The argument is that the description contained in certain deeds offered in evidence by the plaintiff, marked Exhibits A, B, C, D and E, does not identify the land described in the complaint. The land is described in Exhibit A as “commencing at a stake 9.92 chains east from the corner of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.