Strouse

Strouse v. Sylvester

Good Law
1901 Cal. LEXIS 1241·6 Cal. Unrep. 798·66 P. 660
Supreme Court of CaliforniaNovember 8, 1901S. F. No. 1834California2,208 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Haynes, J.

This action was brought by Mark Strouse, a director, and twelve others, stockholders in the Gold Ridge Consolidated Mining and Milling Company, against said corporation and Henry Sylvester, Albert J. Sylvester, William F. McLaughlin and Ira H. Chapman, who, with plaintiff Strouse, constituted the board of directors of said corporation. Said Mark Strouse having died, after judgment his executrix was substituted as plaintiff. A demand was duly made upon the board of directors to bring the action, and, the board having refused to do so, the action is prosecuted by the plaintiffs for the benefit of the corporation. No question is made as to their right to do so. The plaintiffs had findings and judgment, and defendants appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

No question is made as to the rulings of the court during the progress of the trial. There is no appeal from the judgment, and hence the sufficiency of the findings to support it cannot be considered. Some question is made by appellant as to the conclusions of law, but upon an appeal from an order denying a new trial the conclusions of law are not reviewable: Bode v. Lee, 102 Cal. 586 , 36 Pac. 936 ; Owens v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.