Burt

Butler v. Burt

Good Law
1902 Cal. LEXIS 898·6 Cal. Unrep. 917·68 P. 973
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 25, 1902S. F. No. 2284California1,351 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Cooper, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiff on the pleadings, which were verified. The complaint alleges that on the twenty-first day of August, 1895, one Soule was the owner of the premises described in the complaint, and that plaintiff had commenced a suit for the foreclosure of a mortgage thereon; that it was understood and agreed, between plaintiff and Soule, that, in case of sale *919 by virtue of the foreclosure proceedings, the plaintiff would purchase the premises; that defendant was anxious to obtain a lease of the said premises, and a written agreement was entered into, by the terms of which the defendant rented the premises at the monthly rental of $35 from the first day of September, 1895, the rent, after foreclosure sale, to be paid, one-half to Soule and one-half to plaintiff, until the period' allowed by law for the redemption of the premises should expire, and thereafter the whole to be paid to plaintiff ; that defendant entered into possession of said premises, under the lease, on the twenty-first day of August, 1895, and continued in- possession thereof under said lease until the last day of December, 1897; that the premises were sold under the decree of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.