Sheehan

Sheehan v. Osborne

Good Law
1902 Cal. LEXIS 915·6 Cal. Unrep. 979·69 P. 842
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 23, 1902S. F. No. 2237California1,865 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Smith, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying the appellant’s motion to set aside a judgment of dismissal of date February 17, 1898. The dismissal was entered by the plaintiff’s attorney, with the consent of the appellant, but it is claimed by the latter that in giving his consent he acted under a misapprehension of the law and of the facts, and of his obligations to parties represented by him, and for whose benefit the suit was brought. The dismissal suit was brought by Block, tax collector of the city and county of San Francisco, with the other plaintiffs, to set aside a judgment of date May 25, 1881, recovered by the defendant Osborne and the predecessors in title of defendants Schweitzer and the Crocker Estate Company against Tillson, then tax collector, adjudging the assessment known as the “Dupont Street Assessment” to be void, and enjoining the defendant and his successors in office from proceeding under the assessment to sell the lands of the plaintiffs therein. The present plaintiff Sheehan was substituted, pending the motion, as successor in office of Block. The other plaintiffs are owners and holders of Du *981 pont street bonds, and sued in their own behalf and in behalf of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.