Hartley
Hartley v. Vermillion
Opinion
lead Opinion
Garoutte, J.
This action was brought to restrain the defendants from obstructing a road which plaintiff alleged was a public highway. The court found as a fact that the *16 road was a public highway, and granted the relief asked. The appeal is taken from the order denying a motion for a new trial.
Some point is made that the road is a statutory private road, but, in view of the fact that it was never opened and laid out in accordance with the provisions of the statute relating to the laying out of private roads, there is nothing in that point; and the single question presented relates to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings of fact. The evidence in all substantials is uncontradicted, and, weighing that evidence in the balance furnished by the law, the court is convinced that it fails to support the finding of fact to the effect that the road was a public highway. The evidence of plaintiff is all to the effect that the people generally had used the road in dispute for fifteen years or more, to the knowledge and with the acquiescence of the defendants, the original owners of the land upon which the road is located; and this is all. Cooper v. Monterey Co., 104 Cal. 438 , 38…