Hobson

Hobson v. Silva

Good Law
1902 Cal. LEXIS 904·7 Cal. Unrep. 31·70 P. 619
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 31, 1902S. F. No. 2575California1,078 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Chipman, J.

This action is brought to recover certain money claimed to be due under a contract of lease and an *32 amendment thereof. The contracts stipulate for the payment of sundry sums, which were to be treated as rental. The lease was to run for twenty years, unless sooner terminated, and defendants had the right to purchase the leased premises on certain conditions. Among the payments agreed to be paid by defendants was a rental of $30 per month; also $4,000 to the Oakland Savings Bank, secured by mortgage on the premises, together with $26.65 per month as interest thereon; also the sum of $900, which is “now a lien on said premises,” as follows: $200 in one year, $200 in two and one-half years and $350 “at the expiration of the lease, or whenever she [Louisa] purchases said premises.” The original document was made on April 13, 1897, but defendants did not go into personal possession until December 15, 1897, on which day the amendment to the lease was executed. The lessees did not exercise the option to purchase, but surrendered possession on January 11, 1899. At this time they had paid interest to the bank from the date of the lease, up to October 19, 1898, but no more. They paid no…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.