Parrish

Parrish v. Rosebud Mining & Milling Co.

Good Law
1903 Cal. LEXIS 945·7 Cal. Unrep. 117·71 P. 694
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 1903S. F. No. 2631California2,811 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Smith, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for the defendant W. S. McCormick (doing business as McCormick & Co.), and from an order denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. The other defendants were not served, and did not appear. The plaintiff is the assignee of the Lion Insurance Company, of London, for collection, and brings the suit upon a bond in the sum of $7,125 executed to the company by this and another defendant. The condition of the bond is: “That if the Rosebud Mining and Milling Company of Colorado, or its assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by and well and truly keep and perform the covenants and conditions and agreements as set forth in the instrument attached hereto, then the above obligations shall be void; otherwise to remain in full force and virtue.” The instrument attached relates to a policy of insurance in the sum of $7,500, issued by the London company to the defendant Rosebud Mining and Milling Company, upon which there has been a loss by fire. It is recited in the instrument: That the Rosebud company is about to institute suits against the London company, the Western Assurance Company of Toronto and other companies enumerated (twelve in all);…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.