Berentz

Berentz v. Kern King Oil & Development Co.

Good Law
1905 Cal. LEXIS 714·7 Cal. Unrep. 214·84 P. 45
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 17, 1905California1,064 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Smith, J.

This suit was brought to foreclose several liens for work and labor performed in the construction of an oil well on a tract of eighty acres of land described in the complaint. The Belmont Oil Company was and is the owner of the land, of which the other defendant holds a lease, and the latter defendant is also the owner of the drilling apparatus, derrick, etc., now on the land, and used, it is alleged, “in the development and working of the said land and mining claim.” The Belmont Oil Company suffered default. The other defendant filed demurrer and answer, but did not appear at the trial. The judgment is against the Kern King Oil and Development Company and contractors for the sums therein named, and it is further adjudged “that plaintiff is entitled to enforce the liens upon the mining claims and the improvements described in the complaint herein for the said sum found due him, and that said liens are superior and paramount to the interest and claim of all the defendants herein. ’ ’ The appeal was taken within sixty days of the entry of judgment.

The judgment against the Belmont Oil Company must be reversed, for the several reasons that there is no allegation in the complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.