E. P. Vandercook Co. v. Wilmans Co.

Good Law
1906 Cal. App. LEXIS 342·7 Cal. Unrep. 311·87 P. 1116
Supreme Court of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 1906California2,021 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Cooper, J.

This action was brought to recover $791.87 as commissions for the sale of real estate under a written contract. The case was tried before the court, findings filed, and judgment ordered and entered for plaintiff. Defendant has appealed from the order denying its motion for a new trial. The court found that, pursuant to the authorization contained in the contract, the plaintiff procured a purchaser for the lands therein described who was ready, able ancj. willing to *312 purchase, and thereby completed its services and earned its commissions. The defendant contends that the evidence does not support the findings of the court in this regard. The findings are conclusive upon us if there is substantial evidence to support them, even though the evidence may be conflicting or may preponderate in favor of defendant.

The defendant was, at the times mentioned in the pleadings and findings, a corporation. Its capital stock was divided into three hundred shares, and was at the time the contract was made owned and held by J. M. Wilmans, F. W. Wilmans, Lillian W. Wilmans, Clara E. Wilmans, and Martha J. Wilmans. J. M. Wilmans was the secretary and managing agent, and owned two-thirds of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.