United States v. Steven J. Sanchez

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 5640·933 F.2d 742·1991 WL 76187·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 9575·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3549
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 15, 199190-10214California1,966 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nelson, J.

Appellant United States appeals the district court's six-month downward departure of appellee Steven J. Sanchez’ sentence for unarmed bank robbery. Appellant argues that the district court’s rationale for departing was insufficient under the Sentencing Guidelines. The district court reasoned that the remoteness of appellee’s convictions, the calculation of a parole violation for sentencing purposes, and appellee’s drug dependency, a condition which allegedly resulted from medication prescribed during a physical recovery period, justified a departure. The Sentencing Commission, however, has adequately considered these factors; indeed, the Sentencing Guidelines do not permit downward departures unless the offense is nonviolent and the drug use is involuntary. Therefore, we vacate the sentence below and remand for resentenc-ing.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Appellee Steven J. Sanchez was indicted on eight counts of unarmed bank robbery on September 26, 1989, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a). Appellee pled guilty to four of those counts on November 29. At that time the parties, and the district court, believed that appellee would be sentenced within Category II or Category…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.