United States v. Charles Laughlin, AKA Charles William Laughlin, John Tracy Laughlin

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 5895·933 F.2d 786·1991 WL 80748·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 10155·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3666
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 21, 199189-10641California1,579 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tang, J.

INTRODUCTION

On March 10, 1987, Charles Laughlin pleaded guilty to two counts of bank fraud. The district court sentenced him to five years’ imprisonment on the first count. The court also sentenced him to a five year prison term on the second count, but expressly suspended the execution of that sentence and placed Laughlin on probation for a period of five years “to commence upon his release from prison.” The court conditioned Laughlin’s probationary status on his compliance with “all local, state and federal laws” and forbade him to “possess credit cards or [a] personalized checking account without the knowledge and consent of the probation officer.”

On September 27, 1988, Laughlin was paroled from prison. He was assigned to live with a family and to wear an electronic monitoring device at all times.

On December 7, 1988, Laughlin was charged with violating the terms of his probation. The report charged Laughlin with forging the name of another inmate on a bank withdrawal slip. Supplemental reports also charged Laughlin with making false and fraudulent statements on a credit card application. Proceedings were initiated to have Laughlin’s probation revoked.

After conducting an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.