King

United States v. King

Good Law
933 F.2d 1017
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 21, 199136-3_15California2,417 words

Opinion

Opinion

933 F.2d 1017 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond Lyle King, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-10409. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 14, 1991. * Decided May 21, 1991. Before ALARCON, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Raymond Lyle King appeals from the judgment entered following his conviction for manufacturing methamphetamine, and aiding and abetting in its manufacture. King challenges the judgment of conviction on the ground that his conviction was obtained in violation of the double-jeopardy clause of the fifth amendment and the Speedy Trial Act, 28 U.S.C. Secs. 3161 (b) and 3162(a)(1). King also appeals from the sentence of 78 months imposed by the trial court. King asserts that his base offense level was improperly computed under the Sentencing Guidelines. We disagree and affirm. 3 * On April 25, 1989, a complaint was filed charging…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.