United States v. Wilfried Van Cauwenberghe, Williams & Connolly, Real-Party-In-Interest-Appellant. Roger Biard v. Alan H. Blair, and Wilfried Van Cauwenberghe, and Williams & Connolly

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 5840·934 F.2d 1048·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 10001·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3659
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 20, 199189-50275California10,525 words

Opinion

Opinion

934 F.2d 1048 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wilfried VAN CAUWENBERGHE, Defendant-Appellant, Williams & Connolly, Real-party-in-interest-Appellant. Roger BIARD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alan H. BLAIR, et al., Defendants, and Wilfried Van Cauwenberghe, Defendant-Appellant, and Williams & Connolly, Appellant. Nos. 89-50275, 89-55868. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued May 7, 1990. Submitted Sept. 25, 1990. Reargued and Submitted Sept. 25, 1990. Decided May 20, 1991. John G. Kester, Williams & Connolly, Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellant Van Cauwenberghe and real-party-in-interest-appellant Williams & Connolly. Sara Criscitelli and John D. Arterberry, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee U.S. Percy Anderson, Bryan, Cave, McPheeters & McRoberts, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee Biard. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and THOMPSON and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge: 1 This is a consolidated appeal. In United States v. Van Cauwenberghe, No. 89-50275, Wilfried Van Cauwenberghe appeals…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.