United States v. Oscar Meza-Soria

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 6469·935 F.2d 166·1991 WL 90861·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 11111·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4158
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 4, 199190-10417California2,850 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fernandez, J.

Oscar Meza-Soria (Meza-Soria) was indicted for violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326 by being an alien who reentered the country after having been deported. His first trial ended in a mistrial, which was granted over his opposition. When the government sought to retry him, he moved to dismiss on double jeopardy grounds. He asserted that the grant of the mistrial was based on the district court’s erroneous view of the law, and that, as a result, no further prosecution was permissible. The district court denied his motion and he appealed. We reverse.

BACKGROUND

Meza-Soria entered the United States on March 20, 1990. He was arrested at the port of entry because he had previously been deported, and, as it appeared, had not applied for reentry to this country.

This prosecution under 8 U.S.C. § 1326 followed, and his first trial commenced on July 10, 1990. After the jury was sworn and the government had put on its case in chief, Meza-Soria began the defense. That defense was based upon his claim that he was not an alien. The government objected to that line of defense, but the district court admitted evidence from Meza-Soria’s father which tended to show that Meza-So-ria was a United States…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.