DeLara

DeLara v. Safeway Stores Inc.

Good Law
935 F.2d 273·1991 WL 97573
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 5, 199136-3_5California1,483 words

Opinion

Opinion

935 F.2d 273 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Henry DeLARA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAFEWAY STORES, INC., United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1442, United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 88-5752, 89-55938. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 6, 1991. * Decided June 5, 1991. Before TANG, REINHARDT and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** FACTS 2 Henry DeLara, a grocery checker at Safeway stores, was discharged for taking and consuming Snickers candy bars. 1 DeLara contacted the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, AFL-CIO (the Union), and during the following months, the Union conducted a thorough investigation into the events surrounding his dismissal. The Union concluded that the matter should not proceed to arbitration and accepted a settlement offer from Safeway on DeLara's behalf. 2 3 Dissatisfied with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.