Brown
United States v. Brown
Opinion
Opinion
935 F.2d 276 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andre Mitchell BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. 1 No. 89-20536. 2 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 11, 1991. * Decided June 17, 1991. 3 Before BRUNETTI and RYMER, Circuit Judges, and WILSON, ** District Judge. 4 MEMORANDUM *** 5 Andre Mitchell Brown appeals from convictions for armed bank robbery and use of a firearm during a crime of violence. We affirm. 6 * Brown argues that the admission of certain evidence was reversible error because the evidence was irrelevant and prejudicial. We review the district court's decision with respect to this issue on an abuse of discretion standard. United States v. Kessi, 868 F.2d 1097, 1107 (9th Cir.1989); United States v. Crespo de Llano, 838 F.2d 1006, 1018 (9th Cir.1987). 7 Brown's contention that the handgun ammunition found among his personal belongings is irrelevant is…