Pacific Reinsurance Management Corp. v. Ohio Reinsurance Corp.

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 6565·935 F.2d 1019·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 11230·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4344
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 5, 199189-55550California4,054 words

Opinion

Opinion

935 F.2d 1019 PACIFIC REINSURANCE MANAGEMENT CORP.; Mission Insurance Company, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. OHIO REINSURANCE CORP.; Walton Insurance Ltd.; Abeille-Paix Reassurances; Hamburg International Reinsurance Company; Hassneh Insurance Company of Israel Ltd.; Seguros America S.A., Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 88-6242, 88-6560 and 89-55550. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 9, 1991. Decided June 5, 1991. Elliott M. Kroll, Kroll & Tract, Los Angeles, Cal., Barry L. Weissman, Knapp, Petersen & Clarke, Universal City, Cal., for defendants-appellants. Linda M. Lasley, Buchalter, Nemer, Fields & Younger, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before ALARCON, NORRIS and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. WIGGINS, Circuit Judge: 1 Ohio Reinsurance Corp., et al. appeals the district court's denial of a partial stay of arbitration, confirmation of the arbitration panel's Interim Final Order (IFO), and the district court's supersedeas bond order pending appeal of the IFO. The Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. Sec. 1 et seq., does not confer independent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.