United States v. State Of Washington

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 6736·935 F.2d 1059·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 11483·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4382
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 10, 199190-35355California982 words

Opinion

Opinion

935 F.2d 1059 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Quinault Indian Nation; Nooksack Indian Tribe; Lummi Indian Tribe; Payallup Indian Tribe, et al., Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellants, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON, Defendant-Appellee. No. 90-35355. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 5, 1991. Decided June 10, 1991. Phillip E. Katzen, Evergreen Legal Services, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiffs-intervenors-appellants. David E. Walsh, Deputy Atty. Gen., Olympia, Wash., for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge, and BURNS, * District Judge. WALLACE, Chief Judge: 1 Several Indian tribes appeal from a district court order denying attorney's fees sought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1988 . The district court has continuing jurisdiction over this litigation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Secs. 1331 , 1345, and 1362. We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We reverse and remand. 2 * This litigation, now in its twenty-second year, involves an ongoing dispute between the State of Washington and various Indian…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.