Amarok Corporation, a Utah Corporation v. State of Nevada, Department of Taxation

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 6962·935 F.2d 1068·1991 WL 99656·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 11891·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4585
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 13, 199189-16161California1,296 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wallace, J.

The State of Nevada assessed a tax against Amarok Corporation (Amarok) for construction work performed on lands held in trust by the United States for the Te-Moak Bands of Indians. Without pursuing its administrative or judicial remedies under Nevada law, Amarok filed a claim in the district court contending that federal law prohibits Nevada from taxing Ama-rok’s activities on Te-Moak trust lands, and seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against the tax levy. The district court concluded that the Tax Injunction Act (Act), 28 U.S.C. § 1341 , precluded it from exercising jurisdiction. This is a ruling of law which we review de novo. Kruso v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp., 872 F.2d 1416, 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 110 S.Ct. 3217 , 110 L.Ed.2d 664 (1990). We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm.

I

The Act provides: “The district courts shall not enjoin, suspend or restrain the assessment, levy or collection of any tax under State law where a plain, speedy and efficient remedy may be had in the courts of such State.” 28 U.S.C. § 1341 . The Act’s express language clearly bars injunc-tive relief. In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.