Perugini v. Safeway Stores

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 7114·935 F.2d 1083·137 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2660·56 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,840·56 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 333
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 17, 199189-15425California3,752 words

Opinion

Opinion

935 F.2d 1083 137 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2660 , 56 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 333 , 56 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,840 , 119 Lab.Cas. P 10,796 , 6 Indiv.Empl.Rts.Cas. 1021 Betty PERUGINI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAFEWAY STORES, INC., United Food and Commercial Workers International Union Local 916; Gary Granskog; Frank Neth; Donald Weinrick and Peter Mumford, Defendants-Appellees. No. 89-15425. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 14, 1990. Decided June 17, 1991. Joseph Klobas, Santa Barbara, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant. Henry Lederman, Littler, Mendelson, Fastiff and Tichy, Walnut Creek, Cal., J. Thomas Bowen, Andrew J. Kahn, Davis, Cowell & Bowe, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and CANBY, Circuit Judges. CANBY, Circuit Judge: 1 Appellant Betty Perugini appeals the district court's summary judgment in favor of Safeway Stores, Inc. and some of its supervisory employees (collectively "Safeway") and the United Food & Commercial Workers International Union, Local 916 and certain of its supervisory personnel (collectively "the Union").…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.