Tomas v. Rubin

935 F.2d 1555 Joy TOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Winona RUBIN, individually and in her capacity as Director of the Hawaii Department of Human Services; Catherine Jean Carman, individually and in her capacity as Administrator of the Hawaii Child Support Enforcement Agency, Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-15201. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. July 2, 1991. John Ishihara, Legal Aid Soc. of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, for plaintiff-appellant. Thomas D. Farrell, Deputy Atty. Gen., and G. Cher Foerster, Deputy Atty. Gen., Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendants-appellees. Before SKOPIL, BEEZER and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 Upon consideration of appellees' motion for rehearing, we clarify our opinion, Tomas v. Rubin, 926 F.2d 906 (9th Cir.1991), as follows: 2 In our opinion, we articulated a standard not previously applied by the Agencies in determining Tomas' cooperation. In light of the Agencies' "interest in applying [their] expertise, correcting [their] own errors, making a proper record, and maintaining an efficient, independent administrative system," see Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. CHG Int'l Inc., 811 F.2d 1209 , 1223 (9th Cir.1987), it is appropriate to give the Agencies…