United States v. George Anthony Mosti, AKA Victor Mendoza-Macias

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 6961·936 F.2d 425·1991 WL 99625·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 11893·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4556
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 13, 199190-50235California391 words

Opinion

Opinion

Following a jury trial, George Mosti was convicted of importing a controlled substance, Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD), in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 952 and possession of LSD with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). The district court sentenced Mosti under the Sen tencing Guidelines to thirty months incarceration and three years supervised release. In imposing this sentence, the district court declined to determine the offense level based upon the weight of the LSD carrier medium, the “blotter paper,” but rather used only the weight of the LSD contained in the 146 “hits” Mosti possessed. The government appeals this sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (b) contending that the district court erred in not including the weight of the blotter paper.

The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Chapman v. United States, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 1919 , 114 L.Ed.2d 524 (1991), disposes of all of the issues raised in this appeal. In Chapman , the Court confirmed the unanimous opinion of the courts of appeals that have addressed the question, holding that the “statute [ 21 U.S.C. § 841 (b)(l)(B)(v) ] requires the weight of the carrier medium to be included when determining the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.