William S. Lund v. Donald H. Albrecht

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 7591·936 F.2d 459·1991 WL 110449·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 13145·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4925
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 26, 199189-55365California3,282 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hug, J.

This diversity action concerns the dissolution of a partnership and the alleged breach of fiduciary duties by each of the two partners to the other. Lund’s claim is that the partners reached a general format for dissolution of the partnership that was memorialized in an April 6 letter, but that the partnership was not dissolved until the formal agreement of dissolution was executed by the parties on June 4. Between those dates, Albrecht received offers on a parcel of real property for amounts considerably greater than the value placed on the parcel in their negotiations. He did not reveal this to Lund. The district court entered a summary judgment, concluding that the partnership was not dissolved until June 4 and that Albrecht breached his fiduciary duty as a partner in not revealing the offers. A jury found Lund entitled to $1.8 million in damages. The district court imposed a constructive trust on one-half of the proceeds of a later sale of the property by Albrecht, making the total judgment approximately $2.2 million.

Albrecht’s counterclaim alleged a breach of fiduciary duty by Lund in his failing to reveal his interest in a piece of real property competing with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.