Jack Rowe Associates, Inc. v. Sanyo Fisher (USA) Corp.

Good Law
936 F.2d 578
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 25, 199136-3_16California5,030 words

Opinion

Opinion

936 F.2d 578 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. JACK ROWE ASSOCIATES, INC., Rowe Marketing International, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SANYO FISHER (USA) CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. No. 89-55140. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 12, 1990. Decided June 25, 1991. Before FLETCHER, BOOCHEVER and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Fisher Corporation ("Fisher") appeals from a jury verdict entered against it in this breach of contract action. The jury awarded appellees Jack Rowe Associates ("Associates") and Rowe Marketing International ("International") $5,943,820 in damages for Fisher's breach of contract. This court has jurisdiction over Fisher's timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 (1988). This is a diversity action in which California law controls. We AFFIRM. BACKGROUND 3 Associates and International are business entities wholly owned by Jack Rowe. In 1976, Fisher and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.