Eugene Glick, M.D., and Planned Parenthood of Washoe County v. Brian McKay Attorney General of the State of Nevada

Caution
91 Daily Journal DAR 7570·937 F.2d 434·1991 WL 108429·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 13075
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 21, 199185-2335California4,489 words

Opinion

Opinion

Brunetti, J.

Plaintiffs-appellees Dr. Eugene Glick, a physician, and Planned Parenthood of Washoe County, a non-profit family planning clinic, challenged the constitutionality of Nevada Revised Statute (NRS) 442.-253(l)(c), which requires that an attending physician performing an abortion explain the physical and emotional implications of having an abortion to the woman; NRS 442.255, which requires parental notification or court authorization before a physician may perform an abortion upon an un-emancipated minor; NRS 442.2555, which provides an appeal procedure when such court authorization has been denied; and NRS 442.257, which provides for criminal penalties for the violation of NRS 442.-253(l)(c) and NRS 442.255. Appellees sought declaratory and injunctive relief pursuant to the Constitution and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants-appellants are the Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Nevada’s seventeen District Attorneys, the state and local officials charged with enforcing the challenged statute.

On motion for preliminary injunction, the district court held that the explanation requirement was constitutional, but that the parental notification requirement (NRS 442.255), the appeal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.