Phoenix Baptist Hospital and Medical Center, Inc. v. United States

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 7589·937 F.2d 452·1991 WL 110452·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 13143·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4929
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 26, 199190-15244California499 words

Opinion

Opinion

Farris, J.

Phoenix Baptist Hospital and various Arizona health care providers appeal the dismissal of their Federal Tort Claims Act action, alleging that the Department of Health and Human Services was negligent in overseeing the administration of the experimental Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System. The district court held that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the federal government was protected by the discretionary function exeep tion to liability under the FTCA, 28 U.S.C. § 2680 (a). We affirm.

BACKGROUND

The procedural and factual background of this case is set forth in the district court’s opinion. Phoenix Baptist Hospital and Medical Center v. United States, 728 F.Supp. 1423, 1424-25 (D.Ariz.1989).

DISCUSSION

Phoenix Baptist Hospital argues that certain “prime contractors” employed under the Arizona medicaid plan failed to satisfy federal financial disclosure requirements, see, e.g., 42 C.F.R. §§ 455.104-105 , and that the Department of Health and Human Services was negligent in not withholding federal funds from the Arizona medicaid program.

42 U.S.C. § 1396c governs the withholding of federal funds for failure to comply with federal medicaid requirements.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.