Mata v. Ricketts

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 7857·937 F.2d 467·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 13575·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5307
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 1, 199187-1731California1,051 words

Opinion

Opinion

937 F.2d 467 Luis MATA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James G. RICKETTS, Attorney General of the State of Arizona; Samuel Lewis, Director ADOC; Lloyd Bramlett, Warden, ASPC-F; John Avenenti, Deputy Warden, ASU, Respondents-Appellees. No. 87-1731. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submission Deferred June 16, 1988. Resubmitted Without Further Argument Feb. 1, 1991 1 . Decided July 1, 1991. Baron L. Miller, Miller & Miller, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner-appellant. Jack Roberts, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, Ariz., for respondents-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Before CHOY, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 Luis Morine Mata appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus following his conviction and exhaustion of state remedies in this capital murder case from Arizona. See State v. Mata, 125 Ariz. 233 , 609 P.2d 48 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 938 , 101 S.Ct. 338 , 66 L.Ed.2d 161 (1980). 2 The principal question before us is whether a new Supreme Court decision announced after the exhaustion of state remedies and after the conclusion of proceedings before the district court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.