Casey

Casey v. Badgett

Good Law
937 F.2d 611
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 17, 199136-3_12California648 words

Opinion

Opinion

937 F.2d 611 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Fletcher Charles CASEY, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Travis BADGETT, Chairman of disciplinary committee, Don Sims, John Gutierrez, C. Goldsmith, Respondents-Appellees. No. 89-16206. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 13, 1990. * Decided July 17, 1991. Before WALLACE, ALARCON and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Casey appeals the district court's denial of his motion to amend his complaint and the dismissal of his Sec. 1983 action against various employees of the Arizona Department of Corrections for procedures employed in a disciplinary action against him. I. Amendment 3 Casey's proposed amendment adding a new party would not have cured the defects, discussed below, that made dismissal proper. His proposal to clarify the existing claims also would not have cured the defects. His amendment to add a new claim that the summary of reasons supporting the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.