Greyson v. Kellam

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 7871·937 F.2d 1409·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 13398·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5299
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 1, 199190-16165California3,323 words

Opinion

Opinion

937 F.2d 1409 Malcolm George GREYSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John E. KELLAM, Acting Administrator, Oahu Community Correctional Center; Harold Falk, Director, Department of Corrections, State of Hawaii, Respondents-Appellees. No. 90-16165. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 6, 1991. Decided July 1, 1991. Myles S. Breiner and Susan Barr, Honolulu, Hawaii, for petitioner-appellant. Charlotte J. Duarte, Deputy Pros. Atty., Honolulu, Hawaii, for respondents-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii. Before SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. FERGUSON, Circuit Judge: 1 Petitioner-defendant Malcolm Greyson appeals the district court's dismissal of his habeas corpus petition. Greyson contends that double jeopardy, based on prosecutorial misconduct intended to goad the defendant into moving for a mistrial, bars his fourth trial for murder in state court. I. 2 Greyson is currently awaiting his fourth trial for the 1983 murder of his seven-month old son. 1 He alleges that double jeopardy bars his fourth trial because the prosecution at his third trial intentionally goaded him into requesting a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.