State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Davis

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 7867·937 F.2d 1415·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 13399·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5481
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 1, 199189-56044California4,286 words

Opinion

Opinion

937 F.2d 1415 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., a corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Walter Allen DAVIS, and Brian J. Painter, Defendants, and Charles R. Keukelaar, Shellie A. Keukelaar, Charles Rubin Keukelaar, a minor, by Shellie A. Keukelaar, his Guardian ad litem, Defendants-Appellants. No. 89-56044. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 7, 1990. Decided July 1, 1991. 1 William B. Hanley, McCormick, Kidman & Behrens, Costa Mesa, Cal., for defendants-appellants. 2 Richard C. Turner, Mary K. Lenahan, and Robert D. Brugge, Spray, Gould & Bowers, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee. 3 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. 4 Before D.W. NELSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges, and SINGLETON, * District Judge. SINGLETON, District Judge: 5 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. ("State Farm") brought this action in federal district court seeking a declaratory judgment. State Farm alleged that a policy of automobile insurance it had issued to Walter Allen Davis ("Davis") did not cover an incident where Davis shot and injured Charles Keukelaar ("Keukelaar"), the driver of another…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.