United States v. Santos Luis Serrano

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 8972·938 F.2d 1058·1991 WL 133614·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 15879·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5840
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 24, 199189-10583California1,607 words

Opinion

Opinion

Boochever, J.

Santos Luis Serrano appeals his conviction for possession with intent to distribute cocaine based on several alleged sentencing errors. Because it is unclear whether the district court accepted the sentence term of Serrano’s plea agreement, we remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

BACKGROUND

Serrano was indicted of various drug-related charges. He agreed to plead guilty to one possession count in exchange for the government’s promise to dismiss the other counts. The plea agreement also provided:

Finally, the agreement contained a waiver of Serrano’s right to appeal.

At the plea hearing, the court informed Serrano that, although his agreement provided for a specific sentence, the court was free to disregard the stipulated sentence term (presumably after it had an opportunity to review the presentence report). The court further stated that, if it determined that a different sentence was appropriate, Serrano would be permitted to withdraw his plea pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(e)(4).

Thereafter, a presentence report was prepared which recommended a two-level increase for possession of a revolver and a two-level reduction for acceptance…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.