In Re Brian D. Hammer, Debtor. Brian D. Hammer v. Michael Drago and Ed Summers

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 9290·940 F.2d 524·1991 WL 138865·20 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 600·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 17090
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 31, 199190-15678California1,287 words

Opinion

Opinion

Zilly, J.

Debtor Brian D. Hammer appeals pro se from the decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirming the bankruptcy court's denial of his motion to set aside a default judgment. In re Hammer, 112 B.R. 341 (9th Cir. BAP 1990). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158 (d), and we affirm.

BACKGROUND

Beginning in 1985, appellees Michael Drago and Ed Summers invested approximately $285,000 in several business enterprises under Hammer’s control. That sum was secured by what Hammer concedes were forged deeds of trust. In September 1986, Hammer filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy. On October 23, 1986, he executed a deed of trust on his personal residence naming appellees as the beneficiaries in the amount of $400,000. Hammer was indicted for mail fraud that same month; he surrendered for incarceration on February 6, 1987.

On January 5, 1987, appellees filed an adversary complaint requesting that Hammer’s debt be declared nondischargeable on grounds of fraud, see 11 U.S.C. § 523 (a)(2)(A), and that judgment be entered against him. On January 9, 1987, they served Hammer with a summons and complaint by first class mail, at the residence address provided on his bankruptcy petition. This…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.