Rodriguez

Rodriguez v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
940 F.2d 1535
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 5, 199136-3_5California493 words

Opinion

Opinion

940 F.2d 1535 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jose Manuel Barrera RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 90-70220. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 29, 1991. * Decided Aug. 5, 1991. Before FARRIS, ALARCON and THOMAS G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jose Manuel Barrera Rodriguez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") decision dismissing his appeal and affirming the Immigration Judge's ("IJ") denial of relief from deportation pursuant to section 212(c) of the Immigration & Nationality Act ("INA"), 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1182 (c). 1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a and deny Rodriguez's petition for review. 3 Rodriguez contends that the BIA failed to properly weigh the positive and negative factors in determining whether he should be granted 212(c) relief and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.