United States v. Quintana-Rascon v. Gonzales

940 F.2d 1537 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Esteban QUINTANA-RASCON, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Emma GONZALES, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 89-10346, 89-10347. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 17, 1990. Decided July 31, 1991. Before HUG, BEEZER and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * OVERVIEW 2 Defendants-appellants Jose Esteban Quintana-Rascon and his common-law wife, Emma Gonzales, appeal their convictions for conspiracy and creating and supplying fraudulent documents for use in application for adjustment of residence status, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 371 & 2; 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1160 (b)(7)(A)(ii) (1988). I. Sufficiency of the Evidence 3 Gonzales and Quintana-Rascon contend the evidence was insufficient to establish their knowing participation in the creation and supplying of the…