United States v. Richard Louis Durham

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 9560·941 F.2d 858·1991 WL 145867·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 17559·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6288
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 6, 199189-30349California3,385 words

Opinion

Opinion

Canby, J.

Defendant-appellant Richard Durham appeals his conviction for possession of methamphetamine with the intent to distribute it and for using or carrying a firearm in relation to a drug trafficking offense. Durham argues that reversal is required because the government failed to comply with the Jencks Act. The district court imposed a sentence in excess of the applicable guidelines range for the drug trafficking offense. Durham appeals his sentence on the ground that the departure was unwarranted and unreasonable. We affirm the conviction, vacate the sentence, and remand for resentencing.

BACKGROUND

On June 3,1989, Karen Durham, Richard Durham’s wife, placed an anonymous call to the Post Falls, Idaho Police Department to report that persons were either injured or dead at a farmhouse located at 2025 Highway 53 in Rathdrum, Idaho. Police who responded to the call found the bodies of Carl Wooten, Jr. and Tommy Wooten. Carl Wooten was Karen Durham’s son and Tommy Wooten was her ex-brother-in-law. Karen Durham subsequently admitted that she and Richard Durham had been at the farmhouse before she placed the anonymous call to the police. Investigators who examined the farmhouse determined…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.