Farley and Calfee, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Agriculture

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 9813·941 F.2d 964·1991 WL 150081·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 18092·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6349
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 12, 199190-70274California3,129 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ferguson, J.

Farley and Calfee, Inc. (F & C), petitions this court for review of the Department of Agriculture’s decision and order finding that it violated the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act. Specifically, the petitioner disputes the Judicial Officer’s reversal of the Administrative Law Judge’s decision to backdate its disciplinary order. Backdating the order had the effect of insulating Roy Farley, 100% stockholder and president of Farley and Calfee, Inc., from the Act’s sanctions against “responsibly connected” persons. We affirm the Department’s decision.

I.

The parties stipulated to all relevant facts in the agency proceedings. F & C was a fruit and vegetable brokerage located in Oregon. It was licensed under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act (“PACA” or “the Act”), 7 U.S.C. § 499a et seq., from 1977 until 1986, when its license expired due to failure to pay the renewal fee. During all relevant times, the corporation was owned entirely by Roy E. Farley, Jr., who was a PACA licensee for 41 years.

This case arose out of a series of transactions which occurred between August 1985 and November 1985, in which F & C failed to pay promptly for perishable agricultural…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.