Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. McCain Foods, Ltd. McCain Foods, Inc.

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 9827·941 F.2d 970·1991 WL 150082·19 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1775·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 18091
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 12, 199191-35476California2,254 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wright, J.

Lamb-Weston’s attempt to spiral ahead of its competitors was allegedly thwarted by the misappropriation by McCain of Lamb-Weston’s trade secrets for manufacturing curlicue french fries. To keep Lamb-Weston from being left to twist in the wind before the trial on the merits, an eight-month preliminary injunction was imposed, barring McCain from producing or selling products made with the technology in question. McCain appeals and we affirm.

I

Lamb-Weston, a potato processor, began in 1986 to develop the technology for producing curlicue french fries. The unique process involved a helical blade and water-feed system. McCain, a competitor, began work on a manufacturing process for curlicue fries in 1989.

In January 1990, McCain approached several Lamb-Weston employees to help its development. At that time, Richard Liver-more, who had helped create the Lamb-Weston blade and process, allegedly gave McCain a copy of Lamb-Weston’s confidential patent application. Livermore later went to work for McCain. Subsequently, Jerry Ross, the independent contractor who fabricated the Lamb-Weston blade, was hired by McCain to craft a helical blade for it. McCain left the decisions about the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.