United States v. German Arias-Granados, AKA German Hernandez and Miguel Rosas-Arenos, AKA Carlos Lopez-Ramirez

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 9873·941 F.2d 996·1991 WL 151513·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 18178·91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6467
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 13, 199190-50507, 90-50570California1,316 words

Opinion

Opinion

Schroeder, J.

These two appeals raise identical challenges to the application in appellants’ cases of section 2L1.2(b)(l) of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, which requires a four-level increase in a defendant’s base offense level if “the defendant previously was deported after sustaining a conviction for a felony.” Because we find that the district court properly applied this section in sentencing appellants, and because such application did not violate due process standards, we affirm.

Appellant German Arias-Granados and appellant Miguel Rosas-Arenos were both arrested while present in this country illegally. Both had sustained previous felony convictions and had been deported. Both were charged with violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (b)(1), reentry following deportation for a felony conviction. The maximum sentence for that crime is five years.

Appellants then entered into plea negotiations and eventually both pleaded guilty to one count of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a), simple reentry after deportation. The maximum sentence for that charge is two years in prison.

At sentencing, both defendants received a two-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility and each was assigned a criminal history…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.