James Dean Clark v. James R. Ricketts

Good Law
91 Daily Journal DAR 9749·942 F.2d 567·1991 WL 149157·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 21276
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 9, 199187-2560California4,458 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thompson, J.

ORDER AND OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona.

ORDER

The opinion in Clark v. Ricketts, filed September 28, 1989 and published at 886 F.2d 1152 , is withdrawn.

OPINION

FACTS

An Arizona jury convicted appellant James Dean Clark of four counts of first-degree murder. One of the four murder victims was fatally stabbed. Another was shot to death. A couple, Mr. and Mrs. Thumm, were shot and killed. The couple’s credit cards and rings, a saddle, their car and several guns were stolen. Clark was apprehended, charged with the murders, tried and convicted. Following his convictions, a separate non-jury sentencing hearing was held by the trial judge pursuant to Ariz.Rev.Stat. 13-902. The sentencing judge found three aggravating factors present in the case:

(1) Clark created a grave risk of death to Mrs. Thumm after he first shot Mr. Thumm in the hallway of their home, Ariz. Rev.Stat. § 13-902(F)(3);

(2) Clark murdered the Thumms with the expectation of receiving some pecuniary gain — credit cards, jewelry and an automobile, Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 13-902(F)(5); and

(3) Clark committed the offenses in an especially cruel and depraved manner,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.