John Ronald Bertram v. Eddie Ylst

Good Law
942 F.2d 790·1991 WL 166415·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 26186
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 30, 199190-16492California398 words

Opinion

Opinion

942 F.2d 790 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John Ronald BERTRAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eddie YLST, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-16492. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1991. * Decided Aug. 30, 1991. Before BROWNING, SNEED, and WILLIAM A. NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John Ronald Bertram, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) with leave to file an amended complaint. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 3 Bertram's complaint was referred to a magistrate, who filed a report that explained the complaint's deficiencies, recommended that the government's motion to dismiss be granted, and recommended that Bertram be given thirty days to file an amended complaint. Bertram filed timely objections to the magistrate's recommendations and an amended complaint. The district court then…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.