Rodney Browne v. Shasta County, Stephen S. Carlton, Sheriffs Department

942 F.2d 790 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Rodney BROWNE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHASTA COUNTY, Stephen S. Carlton, Sheriffs Department, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-16782. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1991. * Decided Aug. 29, 1991. Before BROWNING, FARRIS and WILLIAM A. NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rodney Browne appeals the district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim of his civil rights action alleging that his civil rights were violated when defendant Alan Bradley was improperly released from prison in violation of California law. 1 Browne argues that the California statutes regarding release of prisoners and plea bargaining create a liberty interest which is protected by the fourteenth amendment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 We review de novo a district court's dismissal of an action for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.…