Hakeem v. Maass

942 F.2d 791 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ali Abdul Habib HAKEEM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Manfred MAASS, Superintendent Oregon State Penitentiary, Theodore Long, Exec. Asst. at Oregon State Penitentiary, C. Keaton, Exec. Asst. at Oregon State Penitentiary, Sidney Coleman, Exec. Asst. at Oregon State Penitentiary, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-35464. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 10, 1991. * Decided Aug. 15, 1991. Before GOODWIN, ALARCON and CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ali Abdul-Habib Hakeem appeals summary judgment for the appellees. Hakeem, a New Jersey prisoner serving his sentence at the Oregon State Penitentiary ("OSP"), brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that the appellees have violated his constitutional rights and his rights under the Interstate Corrections Compact ("ICC"). We affirm. 3 * We review a decision to grant summary judgment de novo. Oltarzewski v.…