Feinberg v. Miller
Opinion
Opinion
942 F.2d 791 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Paul FEINBERG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kermit MILLER, Lieutenant, Midtown Division, Police Department, Peter Ronstadt, Chief of Police, Tucson Police Department, Cathy Cermak, Deputy Adult Probation Officer, Pima County Adult Probation Department, Edward L. Brown, or his successor, Chief Adult Probation Officer, Frank Rau, Detective, Jessie J. Figueroa, Tucson Police Dept., Pima County Adult Probation, Leonard W. Dietsch, Deputy Chief of Police, Don R. Stiles, Successor to Edward L. Brown, deceased, Defendants-Appellees. No. 89-16418. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 13, 1991. * Decided Aug. 15, 1991. Before FLETCHER, WILLIAM A. NORRIS and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant Feinberg filed a civil rights suit against Arizona police and prison officials under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 , 1985, and Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).…