Ras Adisa Gamba-Oluwa v. Ron Koenig

942 F.2d 791 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ras Adisa GAMBA-OLUWA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ron KOENIG, Defendant-Appellee. No. 90-16671. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1991. * Decided Aug. 30, 1991. Before BROWNING, SNEED, and WILLIAM A. NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ras Adisa Gamba-Oluwa, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. In his complaint, Gamba-Oluwa alleged that the Chairman of the Board of Prison Terms improperly postponed his initial parole consideration hearing date and his minimum eligible parole date without due process. He also alleged that this postponement subjected him to a longer period of incarceration, which he contends is an ex post facto violation. He sought damages, an immediate parole consideration hearing, and the immediate setting of a release date. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we…