Eulalio Hernandez v. Samuel Lewis

942 F.2d 791 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Eulalio HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel LEWIS, et al., Defendant-Appellee. No. 90-16434. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 23, 1991. * Decided Aug. 29, 1991. Before BROWNING, FARRIS, and WILLIAM A. NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Eulalio Hernandez, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the defendants, prison officials, in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Hernandez contends that the district court erred by finding that there was no genuine issue of material fact as to Hernandez's claim that prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. Hernandez also contends that the district court erred by denying his motion for appointment of counsel. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * The Eighth Amendment Claim 4 We review the district court's grant of summary…