Enrique Fonseca-Martinez v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
942 F.2d 791·1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 26201
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 20, 199190-70207California549 words

Opinion

Opinion

942 F.2d 791 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Enrique FONSECA-MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 90-70207. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 11, 1991. * Decided Aug. 20, 1991. Petition for Review from the Board of Immigration Appeals, INS No. Amj-rhe-rfh. B.I.A. [Withdrawing, Superseding Opinion on Rehearing, 923 F.2d 861 ]. REVIEW DENIED. Before SNEED, HUG and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that the petitioners' response to the petition for rehearing be filed. The Government's petition for rehearing is GRANTED. The Memorandum disposition heretofore filed is withdrawn and IT IS ORDERED that the attached Memorandum be filed. Before SNEED, HUG and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Enrique Fonseca-Martinez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) affirming the Immigration Judge's (IJ) decision…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.